Legal Opinion

Furst v. Mayne

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 12, 2024No. 2:21-cv-01287Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Robert G Furst, No. CV-21-01287-PHX-DLR 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Linda Mayne, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Robert G. Furst’s (“Mr. Furst”) motion for 17 reconsideration, which is fully briefed.1 (Docs. 67, 75.) For the following reasons, the 18 motion is denied. 19 I. Legal Standard 20 Motions for reconsideration are rarely granted. Defenders of Wildlife v. Browner, 21

909 F. Supp. 1342, 1351

(D. Ariz. 1995). A motion for reconsideration ordinarily will be 22 denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Defenders of Wildlife v. BrownerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1995
  2. Adams v. BearArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Martin v. WoodArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Wood Leonard Sholly Et Ux. v. Larry K. Annan, James H. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API