Legal Opinion

Hartford Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 22, 1952No. Civ. A. No. 2974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, District Judge.

Findings of Fact

I

The Court has jurisdiction of this cause. The Federal estate taxes in question were paid on July 29, 1946, to .the Collector of Internal Revenue, Frank W. Kraemer, who was not in office at the time of the commencement of this action. A Federal estate tax return was filed on behalf of the estate of Clarence Horace Wickham on July 29, 1946, a photostatic copy of which is attached to the return as Exhibit “A”. A claim for refund in the amount of $23,-934.77 was filed on October 4, 1948, a photostatic copy of which is attached to the return as Exhibit “B”. A…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  2. Waldman v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Luehrmann v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  2. Alexander v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  3. Alexander v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  4. Luehrmann v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  5. Luehrmann v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API