State v. Campbell
Idaho Court of Appeals
1DissentBurnett, Judge
I regret that I am unable to join in today’s opinion. Whenever a heinous crime has been committed, there is a strong temptation to affirm the judgment of conviction despite troubling questions. In this case, such questions exist with respect to the state’s pleading and proof of the murder charge and with respect to the separate convictions of battery and kidnapping. For reasons set forth below, I would vacate the judgment and remand the case for a new trial.
Prefatorily I must observe, with due respect to my colleagues, that the Court’s opinion suffers from a fundamental inconsistency. When it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. PalinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1982
- Ridgeway v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- People v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- State v. MataIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.