Legal Opinion · Dissent

District of Columbia v. Weams

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1965No. 3600-3609Published

1DissentMyers, Associate Judge

I must disagree with my associates’ af-firmance of the dismissals of the second in-formations filed against appellees by reason of the government’s failure to note timely appeals from the dismissals with prejudice of the first informations.

Under the general rule, absent a statute or rule of court to the contrary, the authority to enter a nolle prosequi rests entirely within the discretion of the prosecuting officer at all stages of a criminal proceeding before jeopardy attaches. Leave of court is not a requirement in the exercise of such discretionary power. People ex rel. Elliott v. Covelli,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Confiscation CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. United States v. PridgeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. John P. Mann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  4. State Ex Rel. Griffin v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. People Ex Rel. Elliott v. CovelliIllinois Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API