Commonwealth v. Campbell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
This appeal by allowance raises the issue of whether one can be convicted of conspiracy in a joint trial in which the sole alleged co-conspirator is acquitted of the conspiracy charge. For the reasons hereinafter discussed, we hold that the conspiracy conviction is valid.
The record discloses that on May 8, 1991, Detective Peter Grbach and Eric Douglas, a confidential informant, drove to a playground in Braddock, Pennsylvania, to purchase crack cocaine. Upon arriving, Douglas and the detective approached a group of twenty-five to thirty people and asked if anyone was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. Ray Thomas, United States of America v. Wayne Graham MasonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- George Herman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FelicianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. MaglioccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Moore, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. WallaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.