Legal Opinion

Tillotson v. City of Davenport

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 16, 1942No. 45925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStigbR, J.

I. Appellant’s first assignment is that the court erred in overruling its motion for a directed verdict on the ground appellee was contributorily negligént as a matter of law. Our conclusion is the court was right in overruling the motion.

Appellee was the only witness for appellant. Appellee’s evidence is substantially as follows:

The walk in front of appellee’s home was clear, hut south of her borne it was cohered with ice and snow. Appellee slipped and fell on this walk on the evening of January 21, 1941, and received the injuries for which she seeks damages. On January 17, 1941, 3 inches of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Parmenter v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. Templin v. Incorporated City of BooneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Gibson v. City of DenisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Parks v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Lundy v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beach v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Geagley v. City of BedfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  3. Hovden v. City of DecorahSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. Ahern v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. Alber v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API