Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Natalie Weinstein Design Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 26, 2011PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs commenced the instant action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a certain contract pursuant to which the defendant Natalie Weinstein Design Associates, Inc. (hereinafter Design Associates), agreed to provide the plaintiffs with certain interior design and decorating services at their home in exchange for their payment of a stated fee. The individual defendants are alleged to be owners and/or employees of the corporation.

The complaint contains 11 causes of action, some of which are asserted against only the defendant Natalie Weinstein (here-

*642inafter Natalie) and/or…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. LaRoss Partners, LLC v. Contact 911 Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  2. Board of Managers of Beacon Tower Condominium v. 85 Adams Street, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Hollman v. Taser International Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  4. Chiarello v. RioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Greater Bright Light Home Care Services, Inc. v. Jeffries-ElAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API