Legal Opinion

City of Miami v. Arostegui

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 8, 2004No. 1D03-1222PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this workers’ compensation case, we reverse the order of the judge of compensation claims directing the employer to pay permanent total disability supplemental benefits, together with interest and penalties thereon. At the time of the agreement between the parties regarding continued payment of permanent total disability benefits, the Workmen’s Compensation Trust Fund, not the employer, was responsible for the payment of supplemental benefits. See § 440.15(l)(e), Fla. Stat. (1975); Platt v. R.C. Prop., 574 So.2d 176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Unlike the situation in Platt, in this case the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boynton Landscape v. DickinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Platt v. R.C. PropertyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scotty's Hardware, Inc. v. NorthcuttDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API