Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1993)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided June 4, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS ASKED THAT I RESPOND TO YOUR REQUEST TO PROVIDE DIRECTION TO YOUR AGENCY IN REGARD TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

1. DOES 74 O.S. 150.8(F), TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE REQUIREMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE OKLAHOMA LAW ENFORCEMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND ALLOW AN EMPLOYEE WHO IS AN UNDERCOVER AGENT WITH THE OKLAHOMA STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND WHO WAS A MEMBER OF THE OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM PRIOR TO JOINING THE OKLAHOMA STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION TO REMAIN A MEMBER OF THE OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM?

2. IF 74 O.S. 150.8(F) (1991),…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mulvey v. WaldoNew York Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API