Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Reed

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1891No. 263PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original Application for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, C. J.

— This is an application by the plaintiff, upon motion and affidavit, for a writ of mandate commanding the respondent, who is state auditor, to draw his warrant upon the state- treasurer in favor of the plaintiff for the payment of a voucher certified to by the president and secretary of the mining bureau for $150, alleged to -be due and owing to plaintiff for services as assistant state geologist for the month of May, 1891. It appears from the affidavit accompanying this motion that the mining bureau, at a regular meeting held at Olympia…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Tate v. SevierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. State ex rel. Plaisie v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Jacobs v. RiceIllinois Supreme Court · 1864

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API