Grissom v. Roberts
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Richard Grissom, a prisoner in the custody of the Kansas Department of Corrections, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a number of state corrections and prison officials (collectively the Prison Officials), alleging violations of his constitutional rights stemming from his lengthy placement in solitary confinement. The district court granted summary judgment against Grissom, and he appeals. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , we affirm. The Prison Officials are entitled to qualified immunity because at the time of Grissom's confinement there was no…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Cummings v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Thomas Porter v. Harold ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Ullery v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Frasier v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Paugh v. Uintah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.