Legal Opinion
United States v. James L. Gibson
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 14, 2013No. 10-15629, 10-15728, 10-15729 and 11-10565PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents two main issues: (1) whether a defendant has standing to challenge the use of a tracking device with a global positioning system to locate a vehicle the defendant possessed when the tracking device was installed, but not when the tracking device was later used to seize incriminating evidence; and (2). whether the district court violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment by instructing the jury that it could convict a defendant for his renewed participation in a drug conspiracy after his earlier conviction for participating in the same…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. Quartavious DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Chris VernonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Isaac SeabrooksCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Ivan CurbeloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.