Legal Opinion

State v. Rich

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1975No. 75-65PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHbrbbRt, J.

Appellee was convicted of violating R. C. 4731.41.1 Therefore, the threshold question in this appeal is whether the use of acupuncture in the treatment of a patient by a licensed chiropractor constitutes the practice of medicine within the meaning of R. C. 4731.34.

As applicable to the facts herein, R. C. 4731.34 provides, in part:

“A person shall be regarded as practicing medicine * * * within the meaning of Sections 4731.01 to 4731.60, inclusive, of the Revised Code, * * * who * * # administers * * * for compensation of any kind, direct or indirect, [an] * * * application, operation, or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mirsa, Inc. v. State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Texas State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Stockwell v. Washington State Chiropractic Disciplinary BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Attorney General v. RaguckasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. SchatzbergCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Barry v. State Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API