Legal Opinion

Allen v. McKay & Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1902No. S. F. No. 2272Published

APPEAL from Superior Court, Humboldt County; G. W. Hunter, Judge. Action by Aaron C. Allen and others against McKay & Go. and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs and from an order denying a new trial defendants appeal. Affirmed.

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an ejectment suit and from an order denying the defendants’ motion for a new trial. The case was before this court on a former appeal by the defendants, resulting in a decision in their favor, reported 120 Cal. 333, 334, 52 Pac. 828, to which reference may be made for the facts of the case. To the statement there given it must be added that the Occidental Mill Company was originally the property of Evans & Co., then of McKay & Co. (composed of Allen McKay, Con-nick and Sinclair; the interest of the first being three-fourths, of the second…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. McKay & Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People v. San Francisco Sav. UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Lane v. McElhanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API