Legal Opinion

Foor v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1977No. 3-676A126PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, J.

Defendant-appellant Larry Finley Foor was charged by amended information as an accessory before the fact to a violation of the Indiana Uniform Controlled Substances Act. Trial to the court resulted in a finding of guilty as charged.

The sole issue presented on appeal is whether there is substantial evidence of probative value from which the trier of fact could reasonably infer that appellant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The evidence and reasonable inferences most favorable to the State disclose that at approximately 6:30 P.M. on the evening of February 27, 1975, Officers Bill John…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Patterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Turner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Rosell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Vuncannon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Vonville v. DexterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. D. H. v. J. H.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Watkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Peckinpaugh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. James v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API