Legal Opinion

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 30, 1991No. 88-01447Published

1Opinion of the Court

ALTENBERND, Judge.

The defendant appeals his convictions of burglary, kidnapping, aggravated battery and four counts of sexual battery. We are required to reverse these convictions and remand for a new trial because the jury was permitted to separate overnight during deliberations. Taylor v. State, 498 So.2d 943 (Fla.1986). Although there is nothing in this record to suggest that the night’s rest affected the jury’s verdict in any fashion, Taylor does not permit us to conduct a harmless error analysis. Because the Florida Supreme Court has decided that separation during deliberations may…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. United States v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API