Legal Opinion

Ex parte Ah Bau

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1875No. 745PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Habeas Corpus before tbe Supreme Court. Tbe facts are stated, in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

*265By tbe Court,

Hawley, C. J.:

Petitioners are held in custody by tbe sheriff of Washoe County, by virtue of a commitment issued from tbe justice’s court of Eeno township, which recites that théy have been held to answer upon a charge of attempting' to break jail. They ask their discharge-upon two grounds: First. Because no examination has been had upon the charge alleged in the commitment. Second. Because, at the time of the alleged offense of prison-breaking, they were not lawfully confined in the county jail.

1. The statute contemplates that in all cases where a person has been arrested,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MurraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1838

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. State v. DavisNevada Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Johnson v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API