Ex parte Ah Bau
Nevada Supreme Court
Habeas Corpus before tbe Supreme Court. Tbe facts are stated, in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
*265By tbe Court,
Hawley, C. J.:
Petitioners are held in custody by tbe sheriff of Washoe County, by virtue of a commitment issued from tbe justice’s court of Eeno township, which recites that théy have been held to answer upon a charge of attempting' to break jail. They ask their discharge-upon two grounds: First. Because no examination has been had upon the charge alleged in the commitment. Second. Because, at the time of the alleged offense of prison-breaking, they were not lawfully confined in the county jail.
1. The statute contemplates that in all cases where a person has been arrested,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. MurraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1838
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- State v. DavisNevada Supreme Court · 1879
- Johnson v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1974