Legal Opinion

Claiborne v. Lezina

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 23, 1932No. 30236PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

This is a suit to confirm a tax title. The property the tax deed purports to convey was assessed, for the year 1921, in the name of the then record owner, the New Orleans Homesite Company, Limited. It was sold on June 12, 1922, at a delinquent tax sale, to Lydia H. Rush, for the taxes due thereon to the city of New Orleans for the year 1921. The property was described in the assessment and tax deed as follows:

“A certain lots of ground Orleans, designated as Lots No.--Third District of the City of New Orleans, designated as Lot No. -, in Square No. 579, bounded by Bgania,. Villere, Robertson,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guillory v. ElmsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Scott v. Robert H.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  3. Wilson v. MarshallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
  4. Person v. O'NealSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  5. Amrhein v. Nylka Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re NunezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. Robinson v. MafrigeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  3. Baranco v. ReymondLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Le Blanc v. TrahanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  5. Dryden v. Land Inv. Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API