Legal Opinion

People v. Rinaldi

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The court affirms on the memorandum at the Appellate Division with the added comment as to the second count of the indictment that the purported corroboration required under section 210.50 of the Penal Law was insufficient. The purported corroboration related to an inference drawn by defendant in his 1973 Grand Jury testimony regarding who-was present at a 1966 meeting.* That inference, it eventuated, from the testimony of the corroborating witness, was an incorrect inference. Perjury depends upon a false assertion, not upon an inference stated to be such and which turns out to be…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. PawleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. People v. RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. TylerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. People v. BlumenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. People v. Di FalcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API