Legal Opinion

Stark v. National Tea Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1995No. 94-CA-2633PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

655 So.2d 769 (1995)

Janice Marie STARK and Carlos Stark

v.

NATIONAL TEA COMPANY, et al.

No. 94-CA-2633.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

May 16, 1995.

Rehearing Denied June 19, 1995.

Wayne M. Leblanc, Metairie, for plaintiffs/appellees, Janice Marie Stark and Carlos Stark.

Roger J. Larue, Metairie, for defendant/appellant, Nat. Tea Co.

Before PLOTKIN, BYRNES and JONES, JJ.

PLOTKIN, Judge.

This appeal presents the unique, but increasingly common, situation in which the entire incident in question is captured on video tape. As such, it requires us to apply the manifest error/clearly wrong…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  4. Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  5. Gonzales v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kose v. Cablevision of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Peck v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Reichert v. BertucciLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Myles v. Brookshires Grocery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. DUPRE' v. Maison Blanche, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API