Legal Opinion
Earhart v. Konteh
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 18, 2009No. 07-4127PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibbons, J., joined by Friedman, J.,
MOORE, J. (pp. 351-52), delivered a separate opinion dissenting in part.
OPINION
JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Erik Earhart appeals the order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Earhart alleges that the district court erred in failing to grant the writ because the State of Ohio violated his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by 1) forcing him to wear a stun belt during the entirety of his trial and 2) admitting into evidence the testimony of alleged victim F.T.1 by video deposition without a proper finding that the witness was unavailable.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. Myers (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Leonard v. Warden, Ohio State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- State v. Froman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Kirkland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Howell v. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.