Cooper v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
LUMPKIN, Vice Presiding Judge,
concurring in part/dissenting in part:
I concur with the Court that an entrapment instruction was not warranted under the facts of this case and the judgment rendered should be affirmed. However, I must respectfully dissent to the Court’s determination that the sentence must be vacated and the case remanded for resen-tencing.
The Court seeks to overrule Henager v. State, 716 P.2d 669 (Okl.Cr.1986). However, Henager merely restates the rule in Williams v. State, 364 P.2d 702 (Okl.Cr.1961), upon which the Court relies for its ruling in this case. There was no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
- Bickerstaff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
- Dodson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- Clonce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.