Legal Opinion

Borstelman v. Brohan

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 6, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On final hearing on bill, answer, replication and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Howell, Y. C.

The bill alleges that Peter Brohan in his lifetime became the owner of three tracts of land in Hudson county which, on January 28th, 1878, he conveyed to Thomas P. Nugent, who, on the same day, conveyed the same to Henrietta -E. C. Brohan, the wife of Peter Brohan, thus vesting the title thereto in the said' Henrietta, who is still living.. ^On April 18th, 1885, the said Peter Brohan, by the name of Peter G. Brohan and Henrietta, his wife, conveyed the premises to one Priedrich Guldner, who held the title thereto until his death. Peter Brohan remained in possession of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Edwards v. . NoyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Scurry v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Rankin v. CrowIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Nicholson v. TarpeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farber v. Plainfield Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  2. Zuckermandel v. ZuckermandelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  3. Flohr v. SnyderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API