Legal Opinion
Claim of Meit v. P. S. & M. Catering Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 9, 1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtZeller, J.
Upon this appeal we are asked to determine whether the Workmen’s Compensation Board has the power to adopt a rule which precludes the contesting of claims by employers and insurance carriers for failure to file notices of controversy. The challenged rule, adopted by the board in amended form effective April 8,1954, reads as follows:
“ Bule 21. Controverting Claims.
“ Notice of Controversy, form C-7, must be completed and filed with the Chairman on or before the eighteenth day of disability or within ten days after the employer first has knowledge of the alleged accident, in all cases in which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Darweger v. StaatsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Matter of Fed. Tel. & Radio Corp.(corsi)New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Claim of Mohr v. Wiebusch & Hilger, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Claim of Mohr v. Wiebusch & Hilger, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Matter of Perino v. Lackawanna Steel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Park Avenue Clinical Hospital v. KramerNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Claim of Zalenski v. Crucible Steel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Hudson v. SipprellNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Levine v. New York State Department of Social ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- New York City Housing Authority v. WatsonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.