Legal Opinion

Wimpfheimer v. Perrine

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 61 N. J. Eq. (16 Dick.) 126.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The complainants, at the time of filing their supplemental bill, held four judgments against John J. Perrine.

The first, recovered March 25th, 1898, upon a promissory note given to them by said Perrine June 23d, 1897, for money loaned.

The second, recovered April 16th, 1898, by Albert Courier upon a debt due Courier before the recording of the chattel mortgages hereafter mentioned, which judgment was assigned to the complainants April 26th, 1898.

The third, recovered April 19th, 1898, upon a debt due from Perrine to complainants for…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riedinger v. Mack Machine Co., C., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Central-Penn, Bank v. N.J. FidelityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  3. Smith v. Commercial Credit Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  4. Osco Motors Corp. v. MartinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  5. West Hudson County Trust Co. v. WichnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API