CDR Créances S.A.S. v. Cohen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentCatterson, J.
I must respectfully dissent. In my opinion, the motion court abused its discretion in granting the plaintiffs motion for a default judgment based on its finding that the defendants committed a fraud on the court. It is incomprehensible that the motion court was able to find fraud on the court simply by crediting only the testimony of two witnesses who essentially admitted that they had lied at every stage of this action. Moreover, because the defendants sharply dispute the testimony of those two witnesses and thereby raise material questions of fact, precedent mandates that the issue could…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rockdale Management Co. v. Shawmut Bank, N.A.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- 317 W. 87 Assocaites v. DannenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Melcher v. Apollo Medical Fund Management L.L.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- CDR Créances v. Euro-American Lodging Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- CDR Creances S.A.S. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.