Legal Opinion
Ford & Damon v. Flewellen
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided November 4, 1925No. 540-4280PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.
The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this ease is reported in 264 S. W. 602. That court affirmed the judgment of the district court.
Writ of error was granted by the Supreme Court because the decision is in conflict with Moody v. Early-Foster Co. (Tex. Civ. App) 246 S. W. 1087. Application for writ of error in this latter case was also filed. The court dismissed that application without jurisdiction, but made the following notation in doing so:
“We have not considered the question of fundamental error for the reason that it was not raised’in the motion for a new trial in the Court of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HudsonTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Ford & Damon v. FlewellenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
3Cited by48 opinions
- Blackmon v. TrailTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Chase Bag Co. v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Schafer v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- W. T. Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Egan v. Lockney Farmers' Co-op. Soc.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.