The PEOPLE v. Boney
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood
We earlier (People v. Boney, 28 Ill.2d 505) affirmed defendant Fred Boney’s conviction of rape and armed robbery. He thereafter filed in the Cook County circuit court a pro se petition for relief under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act, accompanied by a transcript of the original proceedings. The State’s motion to dismiss this petition was allowed, the trial court believing it insufficient to present any constitutional question, and we are now concerned with defendant’s appeal from that dismissal.
Two contentions are here urged. The first is that the State suppressed evidence at his trial, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- The PEOPLE v. AshleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- The People v. BoneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. ShumIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. ReeseIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. OsbornAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- People v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- People v. JenkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.