Nettleton v. Stephens
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF THE SECOND DISTRICT. This action was brought by one of two joint vendors of certain real estate in the parish of Lafourche, to recover his portion of certain instalments of the purchase money. The defendant excepted that the debt claimed was indivisible, and that the heirs of the co-vendor should have been made co-plaintiffs.
Read the full summary
APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF THE SECOND DISTRICT. This action was brought by one of two joint vendors of certain real estate in the parish of Lafourche, to recover his portion of certain instalments of the purchase money. The defendant excepted that the debt claimed was indivisible, and that the heirs of the co-vendor should have been made co-plaintiffs. The exception was overruled, and the defendant filed his answer to the merits, pleading the general denial and several special pleas. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for one thousand five hundred dollars, from which the defendant…
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
This appeal must be dismissed at the appellant’s costs. The certificate of the clerk states that the record contains á *166transcript of all the pleadings, proceedings, documents, and evidence on file in the case. There is no statement of facts, bill of exceptions, special verdict; and the appel]ant pas suffered the period fixed by law to pass, withoutanyassignment of errors apparent on the face of the record.
tificate that the ail1 thenproceed- and’ev1deree"S; file in the case, does not authoSon that auüm evidence adduced was put on file, and is therefore insufficient.
Nothing authorises the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Fletcher v. WardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Lamazon v. BromschwigLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1920