Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Guardianship of Williams

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 30, 2009No. 2008-331Published

1ConcurrenceDalianis, J.

I concur in the result the majority reaches. I write separately, however, because I believe that this appeal is resolved by applying RSA 21:2 (2000), and because, in my view, the majority has decided issues that are not squarely before us.

RSA 21:2 governs our statutory interpretation. It provides: ‘Words and phrases shall be construed according to the common and approved usage of the language; but technical words and phrases, and such others as may have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in law, shall be construed and understood according to such peculiar and appropriate meaning.”

RSA…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Appeal of RichardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  2. Weeks Restaurant Corp. v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. In re Estate of KellySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  4. In re JacobsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  5. Johnson v. Town of Wolfeboro Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API