Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Monckros Von Vetsera

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1907No. Crim. No. 117PublishedCited by 12 opinions

WRIT OP HABEAS CORPUS to the warden of the State Prison at San Quentin. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Petitioner is in the custody of the warden of the state prison at San Quentin.

From the return to the writ it appears that he was delivered into the custody of the warden of said state prison in execution of two judgments rendered by the superior court of the county of Alameda, May 31, 1900, the term of imprisonment prescribed in each judgment being fourteen years, and the term in the second one to commence upon the expiration of the term of the first, it being recited that defendant had been convicted upon both charges before judgment was rendered upon either. The only possible criticism of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Von Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Brady v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Case v. PlatoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  5. Castro v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Landreth v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Ex parte FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API