Legal Opinion

Hankerson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 8, 2005No. 5D03-3827PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

ON MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE

Horace Hankerson filed a petition for writ of mandamus on January 13, 2005, which we treat as a motion to enforce the mandate issued in Hankerson v. State, 864 So.2d 574 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). We recognize that the circuit court attempted to comply with our mandate by issuing an amended order, but the same was directed to the wrong case. Specifically, the amended order should have only referenced case no. 97-387. Accordingly, we grant the motion to enforce mandate, and direct the circuit court to only reference case no. 97-387 and to follow the instructions in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hankerson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ROBERT RAMSAY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API