Legal Opinion

Miller v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 12, 1949No. 6016PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTS, Chief Justice.

This is a suit on a note together with a letter of transmittal of the note, alleging a commitment made in the said letter that had the effect of tolling the statute of limitations on the note. Appellant, Edith Miller, filed suit on-October 15, 1948, against appellee, M. S. Thomas, alleging that ap-pellee executed a promissory note of date October 15, 1930, for the sum of $7,266.20, payable on or before six years thereafter to appellant with interest thereon and containing the usual attorney fee clause. Appellant further alleged that, although the face of the note reveals…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howard Hume, Administrators, Etc. v. WindomTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Starr v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stine v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Black v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. California Chemical Company v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Dowdy v. Hale Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Temco Feed Mills, Inc. v. BecknerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API