Legal Opinion

Mississippi Fire Ins. Co. v. Perdue

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 22, 1928No. 4 Div. 340PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The main questions presented on this appeal relate to alleged breach of the promissory warranty or condition subsequent in the iron-safe clause of a policy of fire insurance issued' upon a stock of merchandise, wherein the insured covenanted to take an inventory of the stock and to keep a set of books clearly showing a complete record of business transacted, including purchases and sales, both for cash and credit, from the date of the inventory. The contract was in the standard form set out in the opinion in Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. Wood, 213 Ala. 132, 104 So. 224, 39 A. L. R. 1436.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Georgia Home Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Day v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Everett-Ridley-Ragan Co. v. Traders InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alexander v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Duff v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Home Ins. Co. v. ShrinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. American Eagle Fire Ins. v. Peoples Compress Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  5. Coppi v. West American InsuranceNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API