McDonough v. Blossom
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On report. Petition for writs of review in two actions at law brought in the Superior Court, Cumberland County, and tried in that court at the November term, 1910. At the conclusion of the evidence the case was reported to the Daw Court for determination. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHally, J.
The petitioner asks for writs of review for two actions at law tried in the Superior Court for Cumberland County at the November term, 1910. The petition is based upon par. VII, sec. 1, chap. 91, R. S. In the original actions the petitioner was defendant. The actions were upon two promissory notes. The defense was forgery. The defendant claims 'that one James Dunn forged many notes, among which were the two in suit in the above actions. Dunn has disappeared.
The case tried in the Superior Court immediately preceding the case against the petitioner was upon a note claimed to have been signed by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burke v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Brandon v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1898
- Weeks v. Town of LyndonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1881
- State v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Golden v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burke v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- In Re Wagner's PetitionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
- Munsey v. Public Loan CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
- Jimmie Roach v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Roach v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.