Legal Opinion

McCutchen v. Osborne

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1916No. 8565PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Denver County Court. Hon. Ira C. Rothgerber, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Teller.

The plaintiff in error seeks to have reversed an order of the County Court allowing his claim against said estate as of the fifth class, instead of the first class, on the following state of facts:

The deceased obtained from the claimant bonds of the value'of $10,000, for which he represented that he had a prospective purchaser. He gave to a claimant a receipt as follows:

“Received of William McCutchen ten thousand dollars ($10,000,) in bonds of the Crown Hill Cemetary Association. It is understood that these are to be held by me, and when sold proceeds turned back…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Forsyth & LimerickSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  2. Upshur v. BriscoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Cronan v. CottingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Svanoe v. JurgensIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Bryant v. KinyonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Timothy C. Wirt, M.D., P.C. v. ProutColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. California Insurance Co. of San Francisco v. DudleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  3. Chavez v. GallupSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Fleming and Pattridge v. SingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Fleming and Pattridge v. SingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API