Legal Opinion

Paug-Vik, Inc. v. Wards Cove Packing Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1981No. 5015, 5149PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

Paug-Vik, Inc., the native village corporation of the village of Naknek, has appealed the Superior Court’s decision that Wards Cove Packing Company, Inc., is entitled to continued water appropriations from Seagull Lake, 1 pursuant to the Alaska Water Use Act, AS 46.15.010, et seq. For the reasons set forth below, we agree with the conclusion reached by the trial court and affirm its decision.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, 43 U.S.C. § 1607(a), [ANC-SA] the native inhabitants of Naknek formed the village…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson & Graham's Lessee v. McIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Basey v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Prah v. MarettiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ahtna, Inc. v. State of Alaska, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities, State of Alaska, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities v. AHTNA, Inc., State of Alaska, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities v. Ahtna, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
  4. Prah v. MarettiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API