Mancill v. Hall
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COX, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the question of how to apply the exhaustion requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to claims a Georgia habeas court heard but never ruled on. More specifically, the issue is whether the exhaustion requirement compels a successful Georgia habeas petitioner to cross-appeal those claims not addressed by the habeas court when the claim on which he succeeded is challenged on appeal by the habeas respondent.
I. Background
In 1993, Durwyn Mancill was convicted on two counts of malice murder. Shortly thereafter, Mancill filed a motion for a new trial. Seven years later,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- George Everette Sibley, Jr. v. Grantt CulliverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Felix v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hall v. ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013
- HUEY v. MYERSDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2021
- Heard v. DavenportDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2018
- Randall Dale Watson v. Warden Victor L. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Young v. SirmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.