O'Brien v. O'Brien

Opinion

The defendant, Kathleen E. O’Brien, claims that, in denying her motion to terminate the appellate stay with regard to membership in a certain country club,1 the trial court improperly modified the *593judgment of dissolution. In O’Brien v. O’Brien, 138 Conn. App. 544, 53 A.3d 1039 (2012), an appeal brought by the plaintiff, Michael J. O’Brien, the majority reversed the judgment pertaining to the financial orders and remanded the matter for a new trial.2 The defendant’s appeal is therefore moot. We dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

“Mootness is a question of…