Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Doss

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 9, 1991No. 73286PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLSTEIN, Judge.

The City of St. Louis appeals from an adverse judgment in a proceeding brought to declare §§ 82.340, RSMo Supp.1990 1 and 82.410 unconstitutional. The City claims that those sections violate art. VI, § 22 of the Missouri Constitution, that prohibits laws “fixing the powers, duties or compensation of any municipal office or employment, for any city ... adopting its own charter.” This Court has jurisdiction. Mo. Const. art. V, § 3. The judgment is affirmed.

Defendant Stephen Doss is the duly appointed License Collector for the City of St. Louis. The office has existed for many…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McClellan v. GodfreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Preisler v. HaydenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Stemmler v. EinsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dujakovich v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Guy v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. James J. Wilson, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. City of St. Louis, and Adam Layne, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. City of St. Louis v. State of Missouri, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API