Legal Opinion

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. McDaniel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1885No. 11,689PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Benton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The questions in this case arise on the evidence, and it is unnecessary to say anything more of the pleadings than that the complaint seeks a recovery of the statutory penalty directed against telegraph companies guilty of a breach of duty.

The message which the appellee left with appellant’s agent at Fowler, in this State, was addressed thus: “ To Mrs. La Fountain, Kankakee.” The sender of the message testified that “ The despatch was intended for Louis La Fountain, but was sent to Mrs. La Fountain for him.” The operator at Fowler was called as a witness by the appellee, and in the course of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Humphries v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Julian v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hadley v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. EvesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Farmers & Traders Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. NewhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API