Legal Opinion
Knox v. Orascom Telecom Holding S.A.E.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 19, 2007No. 06 Civ. 6824(VM)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) initiated this supplemental turnover proceeding against Oras-com Telecom Holding S.A.E. (“Orascom”) seeking a judgment and order directing Or-ascom to turnover and pay to Plaintiffs any funds in its possession that are due and owing Plaintiffs’ judgment-debtors, the Palestinian Authority (“PA”) and the Palestine Liberation Organization (“PLO”).
In a Decision and Order dated March 12, 2007 and entered March 15, 2007, the Court granted Orascom’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Knox v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- In Re Health Management Systems, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Shamis v. Ambassador Factors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of Ungar v. Orascom Telecom Holding S.A.E.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008