Legal Opinion
George W. Cornell and W. Elder Cornell, Jr. v. Adams Engineering Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 28, 1958No. 17031PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Circuit Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether we shall set aside as clearly erroneous the findings of fact of the court below upon which it held that the patent sued on was invalid for lack of invention. These findings of fact and conclusions of law are published in 156 F. Supp. 872. The conclusions of the trial court follow as a matter of course if its findings of fact are not clearly erroneous.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, sued ap-pellee for infringement of their patent issued in 1955 covering threshold and door sealing construction. Appellee-de-fendant answered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Fritz W. Glitsch & Sons, Inc. v. Wyatt Metal & Boiler Works, Wyatt Metal & Boiler Works v. Fritz W. Glitsch & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Esme E. Rosaire v. Baroid Sales Division, National Lead CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Cornell v. Adams Engineering Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1957
3Cited by27 opinions
- Beckman Instruments, Inc., and Leland C. Clark, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Chemtronics, Inc. And J. Ryan Neville, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Louis W. Parker, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Motorola, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- American Infra-Red Radiant Co. v. Lambert Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. Chemtronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Johns-Manville Corporation v. Cement Asbestos Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.