Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Tyler

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 8, 1986No. 1 CA-CR 8560Published

1DissentKleinschmidt, Judge

I respectfully dissent because I believe the instructions given to the jury were inadequate. Innocent and momentary handling of a sawed-off shotgun is, as the majority tacitly acknowledges, a defense to a charge of possession of a prohibited weapon. State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472, 482, 430 P.2d 251, 259 (1967) (statute forbidding possession of a weapon contemplates proof of possession which is more than innocent handling); State v. Flaherty, 400 A.2d 363, 367 (Me.1979) (although particular statute provided defense for innocent handling, such defense is available in the absence of such a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. People v. La PellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. United States v. Norman N. WolfsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. State v. NealSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. State v. PhinisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API