Legal Opinion

Frohlich v. Graulich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Assumpsit by Edward Frohlich against Clara Graulich for goods bargained and sold. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant, a married woman, in justice’s court, declaring on the common counts. The bill of particulars was as follows:

Toledo. Edward Frohlich Glass Co. Detroit.

Detroit, May 15, 1895.

Sold to Charles F. Graulich, Agt.:

4 P. P. 20x68

4 P. P. 17x105

3 P. P. 62x105

IP. P. 74x105 ______________________________-_____________§201 43

Filed June 21, 1895.

W. C. Harris, Clerk.

He obtained a judgment for $70. Upon the trial at circuit, the court allowed an amendment to the declaration by adding a special' count for a breach of contract in refusing to accept and pay for the items…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Loranger v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. PendletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Anderson Carriage Co. v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API