Giglio v. Konold
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHildebrant, P. J.
This appeal on questions of law is from an order overruling defendants’ motion to strike a pleading denominated “Supplementary Petition” from the files. The claimed error is, therefore, demonstrable from the record as disclosed by the transcript of docket and journal entries, without a bill of exceptions. Consideration of this appeal is therefore limited to that record. The petition denominated “Supplementary” will here be considered as a “supplemental” pleading under Section 2309.63 of the Revised Code, and the procedural requirements thereof deemed waived.
The original petition and amended…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Dickman v. DefenbacherOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Florida Bank & Trust Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Halsted v. HalstedNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- Mede v. MeyerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1907
- Szelewa v. WindelerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- Calex Corp. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 2000