Knight v. State

Carley, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was tried before a jury and found guilty of child molestation. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered on the jury’s verdict of guilt, enumerating as error only the trial court’s refusal to allow certain expert testimony at trial.

On appeal, appellant contends that the expert would have testified that, in his opinion, appellant was not a pedophile. However, the profFer demonstrates that the expert did not hold such an unequivo*530cal opinion. In the expert’s own words, “the validity of [appellant’s psychological testing results] is…