Legal Opinion

Murphy v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 15, 1878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The Reporters’ statement of the case: The material facts appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The claimant excavated a large portion of the pit for a dry-dock at the navy-yard at Mare Island, California, under a written contract, and was paid for all the work done, at the contract prices, the sum of $46,551.18.

During the progress of the work the bank fell in more than once, and lodged large masses of clay in the pit. These, also, the claimant removed; and, although the contract obliged him to keep the banks protected, he was paid for the removal, as for material excavated under the contract, the sum of $7,024.32.

He then claimed remuneration for certain injuries which he said he had…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1879
  2. P. H. McLaughlin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1902
  3. P. H. McLaughlin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1901
  4. Murphy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1900
  5. Murphy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API