Murphy v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporters’ statement of the case: The material facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The claimant excavated a large portion of the pit for a dry-dock at the navy-yard at Mare Island, California, under a written contract, and was paid for all the work done, at the contract prices, the sum of $46,551.18.
During the progress of the work the bank fell in more than once, and lodged large masses of clay in the pit. These, also, the claimant removed; and, although the contract obliged him to keep the banks protected, he was paid for the removal, as for material excavated under the contract, the sum of $7,024.32.
He then claimed remuneration for certain injuries which he said he had…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1879
- P. H. McLaughlin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1902
- P. H. McLaughlin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1901
- Murphy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1900
- Murphy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1879