Legal Opinion

Chase v. Harvey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHill, P. J.

The Special Term has denied the usual application (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1083-a) for a deficiency judgment on the foreclosure of a mortgage dated after July 1, 1932, stating, “ we still insist the court has power over all deficiency judgments.” The question here presented is not an open one.

It is stated in the opinion in Monaghan v. May (242 App. Div. 64): “ The refusal to allow, without the statutory limitation, the entry of a deficiency judgment may not, therefore, be justified by the statute. It must be sustained, if at all, under the inherent power of a court of equity. The Legislature has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. Van BokkelenNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Guaranteed Title & Mortgage Co. v. ScheffresNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Guaranteed Title & Mortgage Co. v. ScheffresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tompkins County Trust Co. v. HerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API