Legal Opinion

Clothier v. Beane

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 27, 1940No. 29370PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

The parties are herein referred to as in the trial court. Plaintiff, Fenner & Beane, is a copartnership engaging in the stock brokerage business, with a branch office in Tulsa, Okla. Defendant is a resident of Tulsa, and prior to December 9, 1937, the date when the transaction out of which this litigation arose, had been a customer or client of plaintiff.

About 9 o’clock a. m., December 9, 1937, defendant went into the office of plaintiff in Tulsa, and met V. P. Lary, an employee of defendant, who describes himself as: “The representative of the stock exchange house who comes in contact with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Small v. . HousmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Minor v. . BeveridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Henken v. . SchwickerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Bosak v. ParrishNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cecka v. Beckman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. B. C. Christopher & Co. v. DankerNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API